Helpt Nederlandse bedrijven al 15 jaar
bij het vinden van de juiste software

Wat is Amazon RDS?

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) maakt het eenvoudig om een database in de cloud op te zetten, te beheren en te schalen. Het biedt kostenefficiënte en aanpasbare capaciteit en automatiseert tijdrovende beheertaken zoals hardwarevoorziening, installatie, patching en back-ups. Het geeft jou de ruimte om je te concentreren op je toepassingen. Amazon RDS is beschikbaar op verschillende typen databases - geoptimaliseerd voor geheugen, prestaties of I/O - en biedt je zes vertrouwde databasesystemen om uit te kiezen.

Wie gebruikt Amazon RDS?

Toepassingsontwikkelaars, databasebeheerders, systeembeheerders, DevOps-technici

Amazon RDS Software - 1
Amazon RDS Software - 2
Amazon RDS Software - 3

Twijfels over Amazon RDS? Vergelijk met een populair alternatief

Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS

4,7 (210)
US$ 0,01
maand
Gratis versie
Gratis proefversie
19
2
4,4 (210)
4,3 (210)
4,4 (210)
VS.
Beginprijs
Prijsopties
Functies
Integraties
Gebruiksgemak
Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
Klantenservice
US$ 0,01
eenmalig
Gratis versie
Gratis proefversie
22
Geen integraties gevonden
4,3 (410)
4,6 (410)
4,1 (410)
Groene beoordelingsbalken geven het winnende product aan, op basis van de gemiddelde beoordeling en het aantal reviews.

Andere goede alternatieven voor Amazon RDS

PostgreSQL
Functies met hoogste score
Back-up en herstel
Beheer van gegevensopslag
Toegangsopties/machtigingen
MariaDB
Functies met hoogste score
Back-up en herstel
Beheer van gegevensopslag
Ondersteuning meerdere programmeertalen
Apache Cassandra
Functies met hoogste score
Gegevensreplicatie
Ondersteuning meerdere programmeertalen
MySQL
Functies met hoogste score
Beveiligde gegevensopslag
Databaseondersteuning
Gegevensbeveiliging
Quickbase
Functies met hoogste score
Activiteiten volgen
Contactendatabase
Documentbeheer
Microsoft SQL Server
Functies met hoogste score
Back-up en herstel
Beheer van gegevensopslag
Prestatieanalyse
Oracle Database
Functies met hoogste score
Back-up en herstel
Beheer van gegevensopslag
Toegangsopties/machtigingen
Google Cloud
Functies met hoogste score
Back-up en herstel
Beveiligde gegevensopslag
Documenten opslaan
Amazon EC2
Functies met hoogste score
Back-up en herstel
Cloudcomputing
Gegevensbeveiliging

Reviews over Amazon RDS

Gemiddelde score

In totaal
4,7
Gebruiksgemak
4,4
Klantenservice
4,4
Functies
4,6
Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
4,3

Reviews op basis van bedrijfsgrootte (werknemers)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Reviews zoeken op score

5
74%
4
24%
3
2%
Monish
Monish
senior software engineer in VS
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Computersoftware, 1.001-5.000 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

Cost Effective and Fully Cloud Managed Relational Database Service

5,0 4 jaar geleden

Opmerkingen: Had A Really Great Experience with RDS, I have been evaluating Aurora with Native RDS so i will be talking more about Aurora in this Review

Pluspunten:

RDS provides support for verity of database systems like mysql, postgreSql, Maria DB, Oracle, Microsoft Sql and a hybrid Aurora (supports both mysql & psql) Resizing, network management processes like subnet and security group are easily manageable. Using Aurora it has become easy to transfer data from DB to S3 using "INTO OUTFILE S3" query Aurora is really faster when it comes to executing heavy flock of query simultaneously when compared with its native RDS, it increases the over all through put Aurora Server less is a extremely cost effective solution when used with proper configurations, it scales up and scales down as per its usage (pay per sec) Supports Auto Backing up and scheduled snapshotting which stores the DB snapshot in S3, which helps in recovery at times of data deleted by mistake or data corruption by some failure in the application etc Aurora provides Export Snapshot to S3 feature, its a additional feature towards data movement from RDS to S3, from this we can easily migrate data from RDS to Redshift or Athena via S3

Minpunten:

Can't change subnet of a multi AZ RDS Database directly, to achieve this i had to first change my DB to single AZ Aurora Server less dose not scale up when used with low CPU utilising application, user should have given the flexibility to change the autoscaling parameter for Aurora server less (CPU utilisation 70%) Aurora the use of "INTO OUTFILE S3" query requires some additional setup steps at the s3 bucket end and IAM role which is well documented, but quite confusing, Aurora dose not support newer mysql or psql versions which are supported by its native RDS's Aurora when compared with its native RDS its slower for executing single queries, officers Aurora is really faster when it comes to executing heavy flock of query simultaneously, but at the least we expect Aurora to perform as the same level as its native RDS when it comes to single queries Aurora's Export Snapshot to S3 feature only supports Parquet file format, and on trigging Export it takes more time to start, it wold be better if the process starts instantaneously

Ana
Ana
Security Architecture Discipline leader in Spanje
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Bankwezen, 10.000+ werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 1+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

Eerder overwogen alternatieven:

High availability even for database beginners

4,0 2 jaar geleden

Opmerkingen: I am using it as a MySQL server. With a managed database server, almost everything can be configured by just operating the configuration screen, so it is recommended that even members with little knowledge of MySQL can create a high availability database infrastructure, such as creating a Master-Slave configuration. It was possible to significantly reduce the man-hours required to install and configure the DB supports in EC2 and the upgrade procedure for maintenance, and dedicate the man-hours to other design and construction work. Including a BD license, it has freed us from license management. In addition, by not needing a physical space, we are freed from the whole flow of purchasing it.

Pluspunten:

It is a pay-per-use system where you are only charged for the number of transactions that occur. Still, there is also a subscription system called Reserved Instances (RI), so instances that generate transactions frequently use this system to reduce costs significantly. There are three types to choose from: one-year prepayment, one-year prepayment, monthly payment, and no prepayment, depending on the kind of discount. Pay-per-use is basically cheaper for cases where transactions do not occur frequently, depending on the situation, so you can optimize the charge by using different payment methods depending on the application.

Minpunten:

I would like you to provide a concrete fault test solution. If you do not have a high level of knowledge about RDS, you cannot be relieved that you cannot perform useful failure tests assuming a failure occurs.

Aleksandr
Aleksandr
Principal software engineer in VS
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Computersoftware, 11-50 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

Eerder overwogen alternatieven:

Will cost you all yourmoney.

3,0 3 jaar geleden

Opmerkingen: Easy to setup. Very expensive. Play great with other AWS services.
The main issue is that metrics collected manually will never meet AWS metrics which are used to bill your stack. And of course AWS point of view will be much costly. Their Enterprise Support can not understand why metrics extracted from DB itself do not meet billing metrics and will endlessly redirect you to yet another expert.

Pluspunten:

Requires minimum knowledge or time to set up the database. Everything you need is basically there. Documentation is fantastic. It just works and takes all the burden of infrastructure management from you. A handful of engines, version, and extensions to them are supprted. Integrated seamless to AWS infrastructure.

Minpunten:

Price. It will literally eat 7/8 of your infrastructure budget. Metrics lies. Performance insight simply does not work. Note, this is an opinion of somebody who paid for AWS Enterprise support (sigh, that's me) Backups are not backups per se, this is filesystem rsync. So it is easy to end up with broken DB. Support is very poor.

Menka
Menka
Software engineer analyst in India
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Informatietechnologie en -diensten, 10.000+ werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 6-12 maanden
Bron van de reviewer

Amazon RDS review

5,0 3 maanden geleden

Pluspunten:

Amazon RDS is easy to use .It helps to maintain the relational database in the cloud.Also it’s flexible and secure to use.

Minpunten:

It has higher cost compared to other softwares.And also we can only increase the allocated storage in Amazon RDS we can’t reduce it.

David
David
Head of Engineering in Australië
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Computersoftware, 51-200 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

Eerder overwogen alternatieven:

High quality, bulletproof managed database service

4,0 2 jaar geleden

Opmerkingen: We use Amazon RDS to manage our key production/transactional databases for our customer-facing applications as well as our development environment, internal ERP, etc. We definitely gain value and efficiency from not having to deal with the management of yet another server - and its operating system, patches, uptime, etc. - it is a real boon to simply have a database-as-a-service that we spin up, connect to, and work with, letting AWS deal with all the management.

Pluspunten:

AWS RDS allows us to deploy databases easily and efficiently with great resilience, scalability, and security - but without having to deal with managing a server. RDS makes it easy to spin up a new database, have multi-availability zone replicas, back it up, and do many other things. It's also dead easy to upgrade software versions - simply let AWS look after it.

Minpunten:

Being a managed database service there are restrictions; for instance, with SQL Server you don't have the sysadmin role and you can't set any trace flag you want. You can adjust a number of parameters in the RDS console but only those which AWS have explicitly added support for. There are other caveats and restrictions for other DBMS products too. Another thing I don't like is when you change your instance size it takes a long time - but at least there's no downtime. Also, tooling is restricted. A lot of great tools to dig into performance and query tracing won't work with the AWS caveats so you have to use the AWS RDS console and logs and it can be more tedious to really drill into application performance bottlenecks.