Helpt Nederlandse bedrijven al 15 jaar
bij het vinden van de juiste software

Wat is Net Health?

ReDoc aangedreven door xfit is cloudgebaseerde software voor documentatie, planning en praktijkbeheer in revalidatietherapiepraktijken van elke omvang.

ReDoc is een volledig geïntegreerde oplossing van Net Health en stimuleert PT-, OT- en SLP-workflow die de dagelijkse activiteiten van praktijken snel regelt, waardoor de naleving wordt gegarandeerd, de efficiëntie wordt verhoogd en de tools worden aangeboden om de omzet te verhogen.

Naast software zijn er ook diensten beschikbaar voor facturering en incasso's, alsook consulting over workflowoptimalisatie.

Wie gebruikt Net Health?

Niet door leverancier verstrekt.

Net Health Software - 1
Net Health Software - 2
Net Health Software - 3

Twijfels over Net Health? Vergelijk met een populair alternatief

Net Health

Net Health

4,2 (249)
US$ 0,00
Gratis versie
Gratis proefversie
60
Geen integraties gevonden
4,2 (249)
4,1 (249)
4,1 (249)
VS.
Beginprijs
Prijsopties
Functies
Integraties
Gebruiksgemak
Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
Klantenservice
US$ 99,00
maand
Gratis versie
Gratis proefversie
97
5
4,3 (467)
4,1 (467)
4,2 (467)
Groene beoordelingsbalken geven het winnende product aan, op basis van de gemiddelde beoordeling en het aantal reviews.

Andere goede alternatieven voor Net Health

WebPT
Functies met hoogste score
Afsprakenbeheer
Naleving van HIPAA-richtlijnen
Voor fysiotherapie
Therabill
Functies met hoogste score
EMR/EHR
Factureren
Verzekeringenbeheer
TurboTenant
Functies met hoogste score
Contactenbeheer
Factureren
Vacaturebeheer
EpicCare
Functies met hoogste score
Grafieken maken
Naleving van HIPAA-richtlijnen
Patiëntplanning
MEDITECH Expanse
Functies met hoogste score
Factureren
Grafieken maken
Naleving van HIPAA-richtlijnen
Qualifacts Insync
Functies met hoogste score
Beheer van claims
Grafieken maken
Naleving van HIPAA-richtlijnen
Pabau
Functies met hoogste score
Beheer van patiëntdossiers
Patiëntplanning
Planning voor artsen
SimplePractice
Functies met hoogste score
Afspraakplanning
Afsprakenbeheer
Naleving van HIPAA-richtlijnen
Power Diary
Functies met hoogste score
Afsprakenbeheer
Plannen
Reserveringsbeheer

Reviews over Net Health

Gemiddelde score

In totaal
4,2
Gebruiksgemak
4,2
Klantenservice
4,1
Functies
4,1
Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding
4,1

Reviews op basis van bedrijfsgrootte (werknemers)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001
Lyam
Lyam
Wound Management Program Director in VS
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Ziekenhuis- en gezondheidszorgbranche, 1.001-5.000 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

NetHealth Wound Care EHR

5,0 5 maanden geleden

Opmerkingen: Love the system. Has been using it since 2009. And with the addition of Tissue Analytics for wound imaging (been using it since 2016) it has made for a well-rounded electronic health record. They are constantly updating and upgrading to improve the system and keep up with industry trends. Highly recommend it.

Pluspunten:

Customer service. Other relevant points are medical record of patient progress, documentation of insurance billing/coding, up-to-date with regulatory agency guidelines and standards to keep us protected. It is fully customizable removing the assembly-line medical record format customary of many electronic health records. Which by the way can get the facility in trouble as these assembly-line formats tend to turn staff into zombies and numb their critical thinking skills

Minpunten:

As with all systems, there is always a wish list of things that you think might make your life easier. However, that wish list is specific to our setting and may not be applicable to every facility that uses NetHealth. They do offer a venue called "Communities" by which users can make change requests for consideration and allows other users to give feedback as to its usefulness of lack thereof.

Marsha
Supervisor Medical Scheduler in VS
Ziekenhuis- en gezondheidszorgbranche, 5.001-10.000 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

pt/ot/st

4,0 vorig jaar

Opmerkingen: Overall the company is amazing, easy to work with.

Pluspunten:

Easy to use. Easy to train new employees.

Minpunten:

Update/New Releases - love the changes they make, but can be hard to educate all staff about the updates

Anna
Physical Therapist, Outpatient Rehab Supervisor in
Medische praktijk, 5.001-10.000 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer
Bron: SoftwareAdvice

Customer support nightmare

3,0 7 jaar geleden

Opmerkingen: We have used ReDoc at our outpatient rehab clinic for nearly 4 years now. We are part of a larger health system and all of our outpatient sites use the same program, which is helpful for all our Therapists who may work at more than 1 site as everything is easily kept uniform from one site to the next. However we have had issues with the system being slow from the very beginning and whenever we have trouble with the program that is not related to our network there is not much our IT department can do to fix it for us. We have found the customer service at ReDoc to be awful. It takes a long time to get any resolution to problems once we have an issue, if at all. Working in a busy clinic we rely on our EMR for everything as we do not keep paper charts of all documentation. If our program is not working then we cannot provide a high quality of care to our patient's and we get behind on all our documentation, trying to play catch up for the rest of the week. It's frustrating!

Pluspunten:

Ease of use. It makes more detailed documentation easier for our Therapists and more efficient. Billing is easier and we like that it gives alerts when modifiers are required.

Minpunten:

Double documentation on eval, re-eval, and discharge days as you are not able to bill from the assessments. Customer support through ReDoc has been terrible and we often have to wait a long time to get someone to look at the issue we are having and fix it for us. Which typically means we have a day or more of notes and documentation to catch up on. Also the speed is slow, especially when we have a lot of Therapists that are all trying to use the system at the same time.

Joyce
Rehab Coordinator/PTA in VS
Ziekenhuis- en gezondheidszorgbranche, 51-200 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

Great software system for Rehab providers in SNFs that require integration with PCC Nursing

5,0 7 maanden geleden

Opmerkingen: I have had a wonderful experience with Net Health, and it exceeds the needs we have to be integrated with PointClickCare to auto-populate rehab minutes and patient information between the 2 systems, also provide the reports and monthly billing exports that I need to provide to the SNF.

Pluspunten:

System meets and exceeds all the rehab needs for our SNF to handle rehab related documentations, certifications, re-certs, progress reports, reports, assessments, projections used for scheduling rehab, daily rehab charges, CPTs, billing exports, time in /out logs, monthly PBJ and labor reports, Clini-SIgn for doctors' eSignatures, Training offered when migrating between Casamata over to Net Health when they merged. Also, great support staff always help resolve any issues quickly!

Minpunten:

Some of my therapists feel the evaluations/certifications are too involved and time consuming due to too many options required to be completed. But once trained well, they understand how to use the system in a more efficient way.

Geverifieerde reviewer
Geverifieerde LinkedIn-gebruiker
Informatietechnologie en -diensten, 1.001-5.000 werknemers
Heeft de software gebruikt voor: 2+ jaar
Bron van de reviewer

Net Health for Wound Care Documentation

4,0 10 maanden geleden

Pluspunten:

The product is web-based, which allows a user to switch workstations and access the same information elsewhere. This is helpful in a healthcare environment or if support is working remotely and uses multiple workstations.

Minpunten:

I personally experienced a few instances where I would enter documentation on one page, and it wouldn’t save. While I am not sure, I think this may due to the page timing out. While I understand pages need to time out in electronic medical records for privacy reasons, this was a little detrimental to my workflow. It did not occur very often though.