Wat is Shortcut?
Clubhouse is een snel, overzichtelijk projectmanagementplatform voor Agile-softwareteams om betere producten te plannen, bouwen en lanceren. Het combineert precies de juiste mate van eenvoud en structuur om softwareteams tevreden en productief te houden. Clubhouse is ontworpen voor ontwikkelaars en beschikt over een robuuste verzameling populaire integraties (GitHub, GitLab, Slack en meer) en een goed gemaakte API om workflows te automatiseren. Probeer het 14 dagen gratis – geen creditcard vereist.
Wie gebruikt Shortcut?
Clubhouse is ideaal voor middelgrote Agile-softwareteams die op zoek zijn naar een projectmanagementtool in de stijl van Kanban die eigenschappen op ondernemingsniveau heeft, maar eenvoudig te configureren en gebruiken is.
Waar kan Shortcut worden geïmplementeerd?
Cloud, SaaS, Web
Over de leverancier
- Shortcut
- Gevestigd in New York, VS
- Opgericht in 2015
- 24/7 (contact met medewerker)
- Chatten
Talen
Engels
prijzen van Shortcut
Beginprijs:
- Ja, heeft een gratis proefversie
- Ja, heeft een gratis versie
Shortcut heeft een gratis versie en biedt een gratis proefperiode. Shortcut heeft een betaalde versie vanaf US$ 8,50/maand.
Prijsmodellen vraag een gratis proefversie aanOver de leverancier
- Shortcut
- Gevestigd in New York, VS
- Opgericht in 2015
- 24/7 (contact met medewerker)
- Chatten
Talen
Engels
Video's en afbeeldingen van Shortcut








Functies van Shortcut
Reviews over Shortcut

Bryan
The perfect tool for software projects using Kanban
Opmerkingen: Clubhouse helps us manage agile software projects better than ever before. With other tools it feels like we are forcing it to try to accommodate our workflow, but with Clubhouse it feels like it was designed exactly for our use.
Pluspunten:
Clubhouse brought us a new set of features and ways to organize stories and tasks that we didn't know we wanted/needed. We have always stuck with tools that were able to help improve our kanban based workflow rather than the simple project board tools like Trello that cater to everyone more than software/product development specifically. There are few tools out there that provide what we are looking for: the ability to organize and label stories with more granularity than a single label (estimates, types, project, priorities, epic, etc), and the ability to have reports like velocity and burndown charts.
Minpunten:
It is a very small thing, but it would be nice if we could adjust the color scheme of both things like labels beyond the default options, as well as adjust the overall interface colors.
Lee-ann
Shortcut (previously Clubhouse) has been a great improvement for us.
Opmerkingen: Overall our experience has been great. Less has been falling through the cracks, and we're able to actively manage & prioritize our development with ease. The application is enjoyed by both the development team & the management team, so everyone is benefitting from our switch to Shortcut.
Pluspunten:
1. The app is very easy to configure & set up. 2. The user experience is seamless & functionality is very self-explanatory. 3. There are multiple ways to configure each component, so you can set up the app according to what works best for you & your company. (No "one size fits all" model.) 4. The ability to set up different workflows for different departments has been a huge help for us.
Minpunten:
1. It's a little hard to envision how each of the components should be set up for your organization when you're first getting in there (i.e., projects, workflows, milestones, epics, stories), so we ended up changing the setup as we went along after the initial configuration. This wasn't necessarily a bad thing, as it allowed us to improve the way we currently did things. 2. The biggest issue we have now, after using the app for a while, is that stories do not populate into the Gantt charts, only epics. This means if we have one-off tasks that are added as stories, those do not pull into the report we'd like. For that reason, we have to set up an entire epic just to set up a single story, for reporting purposes. I think it would be great if you had the option to pull the Gantt reports at the epic or story-level.
Amy
While it does the job, it's not easy to use for sorting or management
Opmerkingen: I am only a user, but I know that our Engineering manager will be switching us to a different product soon for ticket management with the reason that the new product will be much easier for everyone to use - especially for tracking their own tickets.
Pluspunten:
Does what we need it to do - create bug tickets
Minpunten:
Not easy to filter, find or sort. Maybe I just don't know how to use the features, and I know I use them in a completely different fashion than Engineering does (we create tickets, they execute them), but each time someone says "just filter and find", I have no idea and can't figure it out. I also hear from their team about how hard it is to do what they need to do with the tickets once we create them. Not user friendly for sorting or tagging for projects.
Geverifieerde reviewer
Love the drag and drop. Great tool to stay organized
Pluspunten:
I like the drag and drop the most. It makes managing tasks so much easier
Minpunten:
A little confusing to use. The learning curve is steep.
Paul
Previously Clubhouse, Shortcut really did cut our processes shorter.
Pluspunten:
1) Easy to learn - Even our junior members got on-boarded quickly despite their absolute lack of familiarity to such tools. 2) Tons of tagging options - Tickets can get multiple labels and the long list of standard metadata for cross-posting and maximum searchability. 3) Powerful search box - We get lots of tickets using the same set of keywords yet the search function seems to algorithmically know exactly which one we are looking for!
Minpunten:
1) Comment formatting is not WYSIWYG 2) A bit pricey for smaller teams 3) Continuous development is great, but there's always a new key feature deployed quickly that will make you rethink your currently-established conventions. We found ourselves testing these, and even migrating to fully commit to using the new feature instead (e.g. milestone-centric vs iteration-centric). There's this unshakeable worry that there's a new feature yet again right around the corner and we may have to switch once more.