--- description: Ontdek de plus- en minpunten van Responsive en leer meer over de functies, de prijs en het gebruiksgemak van de software. Lees nuttige beoordelingen van geverifieerde gebruikers en ontdek vergelijkbare programma's. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Responsive - Bekijk prijzen, reviews en scores - Capterra Nederland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Offertesoftware](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/148054/Responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.capterra.nl/software/148054/Responsive Pagina: 1 / 8\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.nl/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) > Software voor offerteaanvragen die het responsproces verbetert door samenwerking, gecentraliseerde content en rapportage. > > Oordeel: score van **4.6/5** door 172 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Overzicht ### Wie gebruikt Responsive? RFPIO levert rendement aan organisaties van elke omvang en uit elke sector die reageert op offerteaanvragen. Zie direct rendement via een simpele installatie, eenvoudige en intuïtieve gebruikersinterface en robuuste integraties. ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Score | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.6/5** | 172 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.4/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.6/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.5/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.4/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 90% | (9/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Locatie**: Beaverton, VS - **Opgericht**: 2015 ## Commerciële context - **Doelgroep**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Ondersteunde talen**: Chinees, Chinees, Deens, Duits, Engels, Fins, Frans, Grieks, Italiaans, Japans, Koreaans, Nederlands, Pools, Portugees, Russisch, Spaans, Zweeds - **Beschikbare landen**: Australië, Brazilië, Canada, Denemarken, Duitsland, Finland, Frankrijk, India, Israël, Koeweit, Luxemburg, Mexico, Nederland, Nieuw-Zeeland, Noorwegen, Oostenrijk, Qatar, Saoedi-Arabië, Singapore, Verenigd Koninkrijk en 3 meer ## Functies - Audittrail - Automatische indeling - Beheer van offerteaanvragen - Bijhouden van vervaldatums - Contentbeheer - Contentbibliotheek - Documentbeheer - Gegevens importeren en exporteren - Kennisbankbeheer - Kennisbibliotheek - Leveranciersbeheer - Mijlpalen bijhouden - Projectplanning - Rapportage en analyse - Rapportage en statistieken - Rapportage/projecten volgen - Samenwerkingstools - Sjablonen - Taakbeheer - Third-Party Integrations - Tijd en onkosten bijhouden - Toegangsopties/machtigingen - Versiebeheer - Voorstellen genereren - Voortgang bijhouden - Workflowbeheer - Zoeken in gehele tekst - Zoeken/filteren ## Integraties (26 in totaal) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... en 11 meer integraties ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Veelgestelde vragen/forum - Kennisbank - Telefonische ondersteuning - 24/7 (contact met medewerker) - Chatten ## Categorie - [Offertesoftware](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Gerelateerde categorieën - [Offertesoftware](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Project management tools](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [RFP-software (Request for proposal)](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/31555/rfp/software) - [BPM-software](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) - [Knowledge management tools](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30094/knowledge-management/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [XaitPorter](https://www.capterra.nl/software/76385/xaitporter) — 4.6/5 (45 reviews) 2. [Axonaut](https://www.capterra.nl/software/178036/axonaut) — 4.6/5 (22 reviews) 3. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.nl/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1243 reviews) 4. [Loopio](https://www.capterra.nl/software/133042/loopio) — 4.6/5 (74 reviews) 5. [HoneyBook](https://www.capterra.nl/software/162588/honeybook) — 4.7/5 (678 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" — 4.0/5 > **Hector** | *27 maart 2026* | Computersoftware | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. > > **Minpunten**: The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. > > I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. ----- ### "Improving Ease of Use" — 4.0/5 > **Christian** | *24 maart 2026* | Ziekenhuis- en gezondheidszorgbranche | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: The content library is the most valuable mechanism. It has profoundly improved our RFP answering process and allows us to submit at least two times as many RFPs. > > **Minpunten**: Ease of use could use improvements. I want more hot key customizability to move around the software with fewer clicks and more using keys instead of mouse. Also more of the features should be able to be right clicked and opened in a new window. Also the ribbon in the commenting area should be slidable so that different tabs are next to each other. For example, I want comments, activity, recommendations next to each other as my most used but it's annoying when they are far apart and require multiple clicks to go back and forth between them. > > Overall my experience is great. Made this RFP experience better than any in my past but it still needs a lot of work on ease of use features. ----- ### "Responsive Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *24 maart 2026* | Farmaceutica | Aanbevelingsscore: 5.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: It automates responses, and aids in seeing past responses. Helps track the progress of bids and sets reminders to meet deadlines. > > **Minpunten**: The answers don't always pull in accurately for questions we have seen over and over again. Navigating questions can be difficult, or going back to finding an unanswered question is not straightforward. > > Ok. Has some features that simplifies the RFP process, while other navigation features make it harder. ----- ### "Responsiveness at Its Best." — 5.0/5 > **Anjali** | *27 maart 2026* | Financiële dienstverlening | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: What I like most about Responsive is how it categorizes each product clearly, and how every section has its own owner. This makes it very easy to understand which business unit to reach out to. > > **Minpunten**: The aspect I find least favorable is that when exporting to Excel or Word, the formatting often becomes inconsistent despite selecting a specific font. > > My overall experience with Responsive has been quite positive. The platform stands out for its clear structure and organization—each product is categorized neatly, and every section has a designated owner, which makes it easy to know exactly who to reach out to within different business units. That clarity really streamlines communication and reduces confusion. ----- ### "Responsive is great\!" — 5.0/5 > **Gabriella** | *7 april 2026* | Human Resources | Aanbevelingsscore: 10.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I like that is very easy to manage my projects and split responsibilities between the people involved. I like that is easy to flag and assign reviwers. Also, I like how easy it is to manage the content library and flag questions. > > **Minpunten**: I would love if it had a "notes" section in each project so everyone could share notes and perceptions about the project. Also, I would love if the review in content library was easier to manage, just as a a project. > > My overall experience is positive, I have total control of my RFPs and of everything that is happening in the projects I am the manager ----- Pagina: 1 / 8\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.nl/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) ## Links - [Bekijk op Capterra](https://www.capterra.nl/software/148054/Responsive) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens