--- description: Ontdek de plus- en minpunten van Dot Compliance en leer meer over de functies, de prijs en het gebruiksgemak van de software. Lees nuttige beoordelingen van geverifieerde gebruikers en ontdek vergelijkbare programma's. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Dot Compliance - Bekijk prijzen, reviews en scores - Capterra Nederland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startpagina](/) > [Kwaliteitsmanagementsystemen](/directory/30099/quality-management/software) > [Dot Compliance](/software/192574/dot-compliance) # Dot Compliance Canonical: https://www.capterra.nl/software/192574/dot-compliance Pagina: 1 / 4\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.nl/software/192574/dot-compliance?page=2) > Breng al je kwaliteitsprocessen van pre-market tot post-market onder één dak. Begin met het stroomlijnen van je nalevingsprocessen. > > Oordeel: score van **4.4/5** door 76 gebruikers. Hoge score voor **Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling**. ----- ## Overzicht ### Wie gebruikt Dot Compliance? Ontworpen voor opkomende biowetenschapsbedrijven - farmaceutische en biotechnologische bedrijven en bedrijven die handelen in medische apparaten. ## Snelle statistieken en scores | Metriek | Score | Details | | **In totaal** | **4.4/5** | 76 Reviews | | Gebruiksgemak | 4.2/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Klantenondersteuning | 4.4/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Prijs-kwaliteitverhouding | 4.2/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Functies | 4.3/5 | Gebaseerd op alle reviews | | Aanbevelingspercentage | 80% | (8/10 Waarschijnlijkheid van aanbeveling) | ## Over de leverancier - **Bedrijf**: Dot Compliance - **Locatie**: Phoenix, VS - **Opgericht**: 2016 ## Commerciële context - **Doelgroep**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Implementatie en platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Chromebook (desktop), Android (mobiel), iPhone (mobiel), iPad (mobiel) - **Ondersteunde talen**: Engels - **Beschikbare landen**: Albanië, Amerikaans-Samoa, Amerikaanse Maagdeneilanden, Andorra, Anguilla, Antigua en Barbuda, Aruba, Australië, Bahama’s, Barbados, Belarus, België, Belize, Bermuda, Bosnië en Herzegovina, Brazilië, Britse Maagdeneilanden, Bulgarije, Canada, China en 96 meer ## Functies - Aanpasbare sjablonen - Afwijkingen bijhouden - Alerts/Escalation - Apparatuur bijhouden - Apparatuurbeheer - Archiveren en retentie - Auditbeheer - Auditplanning - Audittrail - Bestanden delen - Bestandsconversie - Bewaking - Compliance bijhouden - Compliancebeheer - Corrigerende en preventieve maatregelen (CAPA) - Dashboard - Documenten capture - Documenten coderen en controleren - Documenten opslaan - Documentenclassificatie - Goedkeuringswerkstroom - Hoofdoorzaakanalyse - Ideation - Incidentenbeheer - Inspectiebeheer - Kalibratiebeheer - Klachtenbeheer - Kwaliteitscontrole - Levenscyclusbeheer - Leveranciersbeheer - Materiaallijsten - Onderhoudsbeheer - Onderhoudsplanning - Ontwerpbeheer - Priorisering - Productiebeheer - Projectbeheer - Rapportage en statistieken - Risicobeheer - Risicobeoordeling - Samenwerkingstools - Taakbeheer - Third-Party Integrations - Toegangsopties/machtigingen - Veranderingsbeheer - Versiebeheer - Wijzigingsplanning - Workflowbeheer - Zoeken in gehele tekst - Zoeken/filteren ... en 8 meer functies ## Integraties (17 in totaal) - Amazon S3 - Aspose.Total - ERP & CRM - Google Authenticator - Google Docs - Google Sites - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft 365 for Jira - Microsoft Exchange - Microsoft Teams - NetSuite - OSOS ERP - Priority Software - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Zendesk Suite ... en 2 meer integraties ## Ondersteuningsopties - E-mail/helpdesk - Veelgestelde vragen/forum - Kennisbank - Telefonische ondersteuning - 24/7 (contact met medewerker) - Chatten ## Categorie - [Kwaliteitsmanagementsystemen](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30099/quality-management/software) ## Gerelateerde categorieën - [Kwaliteitsmanagementsystemen](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30099/quality-management/software) - [CAPA-software (Corrective and Preventive Action)](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/31343/corrective-and-preventive-action/software) - [Compliance management systemen](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30110/compliance/software) - [PLM-software (Product Lifecycle Management)](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [DMS-systemen](https://www.capterra.nl/directory/30063/document-management/software) ## Alternatieven 1. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.capterra.nl/software/148577/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (526 reviews) 2. [Google Docs](https://www.capterra.nl/software/160756/google-docs) — 4.7/5 (28798 reviews) 3. [Google Drive](https://www.capterra.nl/software/161425/drive) — 4.8/5 (28427 reviews) 4. [Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.nl/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17483 reviews) 5. [OneDrive](https://www.capterra.nl/software/161304/onedrive) — 4.5/5 (12623 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Solid QMS platform for regulated environments" — 4.0/5 > **daniel** | *10 december 2025* | Computersoftware | Aanbevelingsscore: 8.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: The biggest advantage of Dot Compliance is having a single, centralized platform to manage quality processes and documentation. It’s much easier to keep everything audit-ready: documents, changes, CAPAs, deviations and training records are all connected and traceable. The workflows are configurable enough to match our internal processes, and the notifications/reminders help keep tasks from falling through the cracks. I also appreciate the validation and compliance mindset of the product. It clearly targets regulated environments, which gives us more confidence during inspections. Customer support has been responsive and usually provides clear guidance when we have questions or need configuration help. > > **Minpunten**: There is definitely a learning curve, especially for users who are not used to digital QMS systems. Some screens feel a bit crowded and could be more intuitive for occasional users. Configuration is powerful but sometimes it requires more clicks/steps than expected, and making larger changes usually needs help from an administrator or support. Performance is generally good, but during busy times some pages can take a bit longer to load. Licensing and implementation costs can also be a barrier for smaller teams. > > Overall, Dot Compliance has helped us move from a mix of paper and spreadsheets to a much more controlled and traceable quality system. We use it mainly for document management, change control, CAPAs and training, and it has made audits and inspections easier because all the information is in one place and properly linked. The implementation required time and internal effort, but once our processes were configured and users trained, the day-to-day work became more structured and transparent. It’s not a “perfect” tool, but it has significantly improved our compliance posture and reduced the risk of missing critical quality activities. ----- ### "Loving Dot Compliance\!" — 5.0/5 > **Abby** | *25 maart 2026* | Biotechnologie | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: Migration and onboarding has been incredibly easy and the team has been super responsive to all of our requests and needs. Document collaboration and sharing has never been easier and we love the master document management system, making our doc control easy. Training and quality events are also easy, and we like how much we are able to customize the system to our current processes > > **Minpunten**: There are no obvious cons that stand out so far. The only thing I can think of, as an admin, is the multitude of things "behind the curtain" that we can see and potentially mess up if we are trying to do personal customizations (adding fields, etc.). Would love a more comprehensive admin guide. Additionally, it would be helpful if attachments to master documents could be attached to the document as a whole rather than just the current revision. Keeping attachments across revisions would be extremely helpful. > > Overall, we have had a very smooth transition and migration. The entire team is professional and easy to work with. Every day I feel like we learn about other little quirks in the system that help with ease of use. This is actually the second company I've been with that has migrated to Dot and both experiences have been great. ----- ### "Not as good as it looks." — 3.0/5 > **Kirsten** | *5 november 2025* | Medische apparatuur | Aanbevelingsscore: 0.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: The document management interface is visually appealing. Unfortunately that is the only positive thing I can think of and need to hit a minimum character value. > > **Minpunten**: It's not very user friendly. Too many clicks are required to find what you need. Sometimes you can't find what you need. There are soo many steps involved to control documents. Trying to figure out training assignments feels impossible. I often feel frustrated and overwhelmed by Dot. > > My overall experience is poor. Dot is not straightforward and feels like a string theory trying to piece all the components together to get a document controlled. ----- ### "Overall a good system, small changes would make this great." — 4.0/5 > **Deni-Maire** | *12 december 2025* | Biotechnologie | Aanbevelingsscore: 7.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: I’ve really enjoyed working with DOT. Its functionality is intuitive, making everyday tasks noticeably easier. The platform feels inclusive, with clear workflows that support collaboration across teams and ensure everyone stays aligned. One of the biggest benefits has been how much it streamlines the document review process—what used to be time-consuming and scattered is now organized, efficient, and easy to track from the almost start to finish. I also like that the associated forms have a direct alignment with the documents and do not require subsequent update on revisions. Overall, it’s made a meaningful improvement in how we manage quality and communicate as a team. > > **Minpunten**: I am disappointed with our current system, particularly with how it handles documents initially in revision. The fact that open documents aren’t visible until they reach the review stage creates unnecessary delays and confusion. It’s difficult to track what’s actively being worked on, which leads to duplicate efforts and missed updates. This lack of transparency in the initial revision process makes the system feel inefficient and counterproductive compared to other eQMS platforms that offer real-time visibility. This limitation has an impact on workflow and makes document management for authors more challenging than it needs to be. Additionally, the signing off process is a bit cumbersome. Having a pin number or an auto fill for sign off would be easier for users. > > As a new user of this system, I’ve found it to be generally functional and well-suited to our operational needs. Most features are intuitive once you get familiar with the layout, and the system handles core quality processes reliably. There is a gradual learning curve—especially when navigating less frequently used modules—but with a bit of hands-on time, the workflows become much clearer. Overall, it’s a solid platform that supports day-to-day tasks effectively and becomes easier to use the more you work with it. ----- ### "A Structured and Reliable Quality Management Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Melike** | *13 november 2025* | Biotechnologie | Aanbevelingsscore: 9.0/10 > > **Pluspunten**: The platform provides a clear and structured workflow for managing non-conformities, including well-defined steps for registration, investigation, and follow-up. Its traceability, audit trail functionality, and ability to centralize documentation contribute to a more consistent and compliant quality management process. > > **Minpunten**: Some parts of the interface can feel rigid, with limited flexibility to tailor fields or workflows to organization-specific needs. Occasional navigation constraints and loading times can also slow down daily work, particularly when handling multiple cases in parallel. > > My overall experience has been positive. The system supports a structured and compliant approach to quality processes and has reduced the reliance on manual methods. While certain usability aspects could be improved, the platform offers reliable functionality for documentation control and non-conformity management. ----- Pagina: 1 / 4\ Volgende: [Volgende pagina](https://www.capterra.nl/software/192574/dot-compliance?page=2) ## Links - [Bekijk op Capterra](https://www.capterra.nl/software/192574/dot-compliance) ## Deze pagina is beschikbaar in de volgende talen | Locatie | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Gestructureerde gegevens